Editorial Policy

Our editorial purpose

TodayInfo publishes opportunity information to help readers understand and act on legitimate public information. Content should serve a reader first: explain the opportunity, preserve important facts, identify the source and make the next step clear. Pages should not exist merely to increase page count or attract search traffic.

Source standards

• Prefer official organisation pages, government sources, institutional pages and reliable public APIs where available.
• Retain the source name and URL when an opportunity comes from an external source.
• Do not invent closing dates, salaries, eligibility rules or application requirements that the source does not provide.
• When a feed is used, treat the original listing as the final authority for live availability.
• Clearly separate TodayInfo guidance from facts attributed to the source.

Automation and AI assistance

TodayInfo may use automation or AI-assisted workflows to clean text, classify content, create structured fields, identify duplication and draft reader-focused summaries. These tools are useful for consistency and scale, but they do not change the need for source transparency. Automated output should not be published as unsupported fact. Where automation is used, the purpose is to organise source-backed information and improve usability, not to manufacture expertise or manipulate search rankings.

Quality gates

Indexable pages should provide meaningful information beyond a title and outbound link. Pages that are materially thin, broken, duplicated, missing essential source context or otherwise not useful should be improved or kept out of search indexing until they meet the site’s quality standard. TodayInfo also maintains internal links, metadata, canonical URLs and sitemap hygiene as part of editorial maintenance.

Updates and freshness

Opportunity content is time-sensitive. Where a closing date is known, status should reflect it. Where no date is known, TodayInfo should say so rather than guess. Readers are encouraged to confirm the original source immediately before applying. Editorial updates may change summaries, links, status and structured fields as better information becomes available.

Corrections and accountability

Factual errors, broken links and source concerns can be reported to [email protected]. Corrections are handled under the Corrections Policy. TodayInfo aims to make meaningful changes rather than silently preserving known errors.

Reader-first publishing decisions

Publishing volume is not the editorial goal. If a large import contains records that are too thin, duplicated, poorly sourced or inaccessible, TodayInfo may publish fewer pages, mark some pages noindex or hold them for review. A smaller set of useful pages is preferable to a larger set that repeats the same generic material. This principle also applies to automated enrichment: added text should explain source-specific facts or useful preparation, not merely increase a word counter.

Research and reader resources

Read how we evaluate opportunity sources, our practical application guide, and the editorial team profile. Questions or corrections: [email protected].